


Marrow stimulation techniques
The issue is that joint cartilage has no blood supply of its own and when damaged it has little ability to heal itself. Surgeons discovered that penetrating the bone plate below the cartilage layer allowed blood to enter the area, causing a local clot and creating the environment for progenitor cells and growth factors to cover the damaged area with fibrocartilage.
An early technique evolved of drilling tiny holes from within the knee joint through the cartilage base plate (Pridie drilling) , but this apparently could cause heat damage and the technique was superceded by microfracture, where a small 'pick' was used to create the holes. Microfracture is now giving way to nanofracture, which is more of a needling technique, and this is now often done in combination with deliberate enhancement of the healing environment with other regenerative methods.
Painful chondral defects of the knee are very difficult problems.
Shortcomings of marrow stimulation techniques include the following: limited production of hyaline repair tissue, unpredictable repair cartilage volume, deterioration of results over time, and potential negative impacts on later cellular transplantation, if required
Recent studies show some promise when combining microfracture with other adjuncts such as PRP or other progenitor cell stimulants, or scaffolding.
Other relevant links
Regenerative surgery, Abrasion arthroplasty, Microfracture, Nanofracture, AMIC, NAMIC