I'm mulling over conflicting opinions re: ACL revision. Primary recon was 5 yrs ago with an allograft that has stretched enough to have positive pivot shift on exam, and my own personal pivot shifts several times a day. One doc says not worth doing revision given my age (46-year old fit and active woman) and to limit/change my activities; other doc says results aren't guaranteed, but is likely to at least allow me to contiinue current activities longer. Both docs have convinced me that my soccer days are over (bummer!) So, any info out there re: the role age plays in the results of revision?
Thanks